ඇහැලෙපොල අදිගාර් (අගමැති ) ඉංග්රීසි කොළඹ ආණ්ඩුවට එක් වූ නිසා උරණ වූ කන්ද උඩ රට මහරජු ශ්රී වික්රම රාජසිංහ ඇහැලපොල ළමාතැනීට සිය දරුව මද්දුම බණ්ඩාරගෙ පුංචි මල්ලිව වනේ දමා කොටන්න අණකල වඩුග රජාට මොනව කලත් හිත් මදි කියල හිතෙන විදියට තමයි අපිට ඉතිහාසෙ කියල දුන්නෙ.
නමුත් ඇත්තම තත්වය මොකද්ද?
ඉන්පසුව බලයට ආ අපේ සිංහල නායකයින් යටතේ වනේ දමා කෙටීමවට වඩා දේවල් සිදු නොවුයේද?
ස්වෛරීත්වය වෙනුවෙන් සටන් වැදි ද්රවිඩ නායක්කා වංශිකයෝ අප අමතක කරලාද?
අපේ අවසන් රජු ශ්රී වික්රම රාජසිංහ රජතුමාගේ අභාවයේ 181 වන සැමරුම පසුගිය සඳුදා මදුරාසියේ වෙල්ලෝරයේදී පැවත්වීමට නියමිතව තිබුනා.
ටැමිල් නෙට් වෙබ් අඩවියේ සඳහන්ව තුබුනා ශ්රී ලංකා ආණ්ඩුව මහලොකුවට ස්වෛරීත්වය ගැන කතා කලත් සුද්දන්ට එරෙහිව ලංකාවේ ස්වෛරීත්වය වෙනුවෙන් සටන් කළ නායක්කා වංශික වික්රම රාජසිංහ නොහොත් කන්නුශාමීව අමතක කර තිබීමට හේතුව රජු දෙමල තෙලිඟු සම්භවයක් තිබීම නිසා කියල.
මේවත් හිතන්න ඕන පැති.
අපි අපේ නියම ඇත්ත ඉතිහාසය සොයා යා යුතුයි.
සිරස නිව්ස් ෆස්ට් ජාතික සමගිය,ද්රවිඩ නායකයන් ගැන 9/2/12 කල කුඩා වැඩ සටහනක්
Last king of Kandy remembered in Tamil Nadu[TamilNet, Wednesday, 01 February 2012, 01:48 GMT]
Sri Wikrama Rajasinghe alias Ka’n’nuch-chaami, the last king of Kandy, from whom the British captured the sovereignty of the last remaining kingdom in the island then called Ceylon, was remembered by his heirs and relatives in Tamil Nadu at his memorial in Vealoor (Vellore) in Tamil Nadu on his 181st death anniversary on Monday. Those who claim and uphold ‘unitary’ sovereignty over the entire island today never care for the king, who fought against colonialism for native sovereignty last remaining in the island, just because he was belonging to the Mathurai Naayakka dynasty of Tamil-Telugu origin. This is a small, but revealing example on the attitude of the sovereignty claim of the Sinhala state of Sri Lanka, showing why the sovereignty of genocide-affected Eezham Tamils in the island should never be vested into the hands of this state, commented an academic in Jaffna.
In 1815, the invading British captured Sri Wikrama Rajasinghe and his queen after a brutal war. Later, the chieftains of Kandy signed a treaty with the invaders, agreeing for the transfer of sovereignty to the British Crown.
The Royal family was then taken to British India and was imprisoned at the Fort of Vealoor (Vellore) in Tamil Nadu. The Vellore fort was also once belonging to the dynasty of Wikrama Rajasinghe, originating from the Vijayanagara Empire.
The king died on 30 January 1832, at Vellore and was buried at the bed of the river Paalaa’ru, nearby. His queen Saaviththiri Devi and children were also buried at the same place after their death later.
The crown, throne and other royal regalia taken by the British to London were later returned to Ceylon and they are now in the display of Colombo Museum. The personal items used by the imprisoned king, such as his dice-game set etc., could be found in the Tamil Nadu State museum at Vellore.
The birth name of the king was Ka’n’nuch-chaami. Another contender for the throne of Kandy from the same family, by the name Muththuch-chaami, was patronized by the British who kept him in Va’n’naar-pa’n’nai in Jaffna in the locality where the Kilner Building stands now. The British who wanted to appease Wikrama Rajasinghe after their defeat in an earlier war, presented him the head of Muththuch-chaami on a platter.
The story of Wikrama Rajasinghe became folklore in Tamil in the 19th century itself. Early plays by the name of Ka’ndi Raajan Kathai, and in the form of Kooththu theatre, were composed and performed at Mathurai in Tamil Nadu as early as in the late 19th century.
However, in Sinhala historiography, the English version that Wikrama Rajasinghe was a tyrant became easily accepted and the highlight was the king brutally torturing and killing the family of a Sinhala chieftain for treason.
The English historiography found it convenient to justify the transfer of sovereignty, citing tyranny of the Naayakka king on the Kandyans.
But in our times today, the powers of new imperialism contesting for the island and the international system such as the UN, find it convenient to cite at ‘Sri Lankan sovereignty’ in allowing even genocide of a nation.
Mahinda Rajapaksa, who never hesitated to commit genocide of Eezham Tamils, justifies all his actions in the name of ‘Sri Lankan sovereignty’ and he is the hero of the ‘Mahavamsa’ he is composing.
The international polity of the New World Order seems to have ‘matured’ enough in making no pretentions over proclaiming shamelessly that ‘sovereignty’ is not a people’s right to protect their nation.
Sri Lanka that doesn’t remember much the Tamil-Telugu sovereign of the Mathurai family who last defended sovereignty in the island against European colonialism, now maintains an impressive memorial in Colombo for the IPKF of the New Delhi Establishment that was known for its atrocities committed on Tamils of the island, in the name of upholding Sri Lanka’s sovereignty.
The advent of this new historiography on sovereignty in the island, replacing the English historiography, has to be carefully understood both in the island and in Tamil Nadu, commented the academic in Jaffna.